​A foolish idea came to me this morning. A “comparison between art and Bitcoin”, especially in how each relies heavily on perceived value rather than intrinsic, production-based value. Both art and Bitcoin indeed share qualities that set them apart from tangible goods priced on production costs or inherent utility. Here’s a breakdown of why this assumption has a basis.

Artists came first
Estimating the number of artists compared to the global population is tricky, especially because defining who counts as an "artist" is subjective some might say it's anyone who creates art, while others might consider only those pursuing art professionally. However, let’s try to form a rough estimate. According to various studies and reports from organizations like UNESCO and arts councils, around 1–3% of the global workforce might be involved in creative fields, which would encompass all kinds of artists, visual artists, musicians, writers, performers, etc. Given a world population of about 8 billion, this could suggest anywhere from 80 million to 240 million people might identify as artists or work creatively in some capacity. If we narrow this further to fine arts (visual artists, sculptors, painters), it could be closer to 0.1–0.5% of the population, which would mean around 8–40 million people globally. Of course, these numbers are very approximate, as they vary by culture, access to resources, and how each society defines and supports artistic work. Still, this range gives a sense of the rarity and diversity of artistic voices relative to the global population.

Then came Bitcoin
Created in 2009 by an anonymous individual or group known as Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin is the world’s first decentralized digital currency. It operates without a central authority, relying instead on a peer-to-peer network and blockchain technology to manage transactions. Bitcoin’s blockchain is an immutable, transparent ledger that records all transactions, making it secure, tamper-proof, and resistant to censorship. Unlike traditional currencies, Bitcoin has a limited supply of 21 million coins, which adds scarcity and can increase its value over time. Bitcoin’s value is primarily influenced by demand, market sentiment, and its scarcity, making it highly volatile. Yet, its appeal lies in its potential as a store of value, an alternative to fiat currencies, and a hedge against inflation. Additionally, Bitcoin has sparked the broader adoption of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology across various industries, from finance to supply chains.

Over the years, Bitcoin has grown from a niche interest to a mainstream investment, with institutions and governments increasingly acknowledging its relevance. Its decentralized nature and disruptive potential continue to fuel debates about the future of money, privacy, and financial sovereignty, as Bitcoin challenges traditional systems and empowers individuals globally.
 
1. Value Perception and Demand

• Art: The value of art is largely determined by subjective factors such as its creator, uniqueness, historical or cultural significance, and the emotional response it evokes in the viewer. Because of these unique qualities, people are willing to pay for art based on its intangible worth to them, not just on the materials or time used to create it.
• Bitcoin: Bitcoin’s value is determined by what people are willing to pay for it in a highly speculative market. It's underpinned by the belief in its scarcity, its decentralized nature, and its potential as a financial asset. Like art, it lacks a standard price tied to a tangible production cost, depending instead on what investors believe it’s worth in the market.

2. Fluctuation Over Time

• Both art and Bitcoin can experience large price fluctuations. Art can appreciate or depreciate due to shifting tastes, the artist’s reputation, or even macroeconomic conditions. Similarly, Bitcoin is volatile, swayed by market trends, investor sentiment, regulatory changes, and technological developments.

3. Absence of Production-Based Value

• Art and Bitcoin both lack a production-based valuation model commonly found in tangible goods, where costs for materials, labor, and logistics contribute to pricing. For example, physical goods like a car or a house generally have prices linked to the cost of manufacturing, materials, labor, etc. However, with art and Bitcoin, their prices can soar far beyond any "cost to produce" due to market sentiment and perceived scarcity.

4. Speculation and Investment Value

• Both art and Bitcoin can serve as speculative assets. Art collectors or investors may buy pieces hoping they appreciate its value, much like investors in Bitcoin might buy it as a hedge or a speculative bet.

Some Nuances to Consider:

• While both lack production-based intrinsic value, art can have cultural or historical significance that provides a kind of intrinsic social value, even if it’s not financial. The emotional and aesthetic impact of art can lend it lasting worth beyond monetary value.
• Bitcoin has potential utility within the financial world due to its decentralized and borderless nature, which could justify part of its valuation based on this unique function, even if it’s still largely speculative.

 
Bitcoin indeed have a strict limit—21 million coins—that makes it rarer, in a purely numerical sense, than artists. And its value is uniquely tied to market forces, demand, and scarcity. Unlike artworks, which are valued for their uniqueness, vision, or emotional impact, Bitcoin’s value is more abstract, often appealing to a desire for security, autonomy, and alternative assets.

Art, on the other hand, is abundant in a more flexible way. There are countless unique works, each one distinct and with emotional or cultural significance that can’t be precisely quantified. However, art’s abundance in creativity doesn’t mean it’s universally valued—while everyone can feel emotions, the appreciation of art is deeply personal and subjective, and not everyone values it in monetary terms.

Bitcoin’s fixed supply, combined with its appeal to people’s emotions, like the desire for freedom from traditional financial systems gives it a kind of universality that contemporary art often struggles to achieve. In this light, Bitcoin becomes almost like an emotional artifact itself, shaped by taste and desire for an alternate form of security, which, as you say, gives it an edge in global perception.

Both art and Bitcoin are valued by perceived worth rather than any intrinsic production cost, leading to their volatility and speculative nature. However, each may still have different forms of “real” value. Art in its cultural or emotional impact and Bitcoin in its potential utility as a digital asset.

So, we see that there are more artists than Bitcoins in the world, which means crypto is scarcer than creativity! But while art asks us to feel, Bitcoin asks us to hold, maybe that’s why one hangs on our walls and the other hides in our wallets. So next time you're wondering where to invest, remember, art might fill your soul, but Bitcoin could fill your portfolio… unless you end up buying art with Bitcoin, in which case, congrats—you’ve achieved peak modernity!

Every year, for reasons no one can exactly pinpoint, a growing number of artists decide to get better acquainted with a particular muse—one who doesn’t need a coffee invitation to show up. Instead, this muse has a reputation for showing up when you drink a suspicious-looking tea or munch on a handful of mushrooms. And she’s not a conventional muse, either. Let’s just call her "The Spirit of Psychedelia."

So, imagine an artist named Leo. Leo had a bit of a dry spell lately. His paintings look like someone left a latte out too long, all brown tones and boring blots. “You need inspiration,” says his friend Amelia, her eyes gleaming with the secret knowledge of someone who’s “been there, done that” with a side of vision quests. And before Leo knows it, he’s signed up for an Ayahuasca retreat held in a log cabin that smells vaguely of sage and patchouli.

The first rule of this psychedelic retreat: Leave your ego at the door. The second rule? Don’t ask too many questions, because no one really knows what’s going on. It’s the mystery that counts. Leo, however, has lots of questions. Will he be able to paint a masterpiece? Will he see the universe? Will he see himself? Will he be able to find his shoes afterward?

The retreat kicks off with a circle, everyone gazing into the fire, awaiting the magical brew. When Leo finally drinks it, it tastes somewhere between muddy water and regret. Not exactly the most inspiring flavor, but as the hours pass, things start to shift. Colors bloom from the fire’s embers, stretching and melting like neon taffy. The universe breathes in and out, and Leo suddenly feels that he’s got it all figured out.

The forest around the cabin now feels like a wise old friend, and then it hits him: trees are alive. The trees know things. Maybe even some important things, like how to get rid of art block. He decides to ask one. “What should I do to create art people will remember?” he whispers to a giant oak. The oak considers him, at least he’s pretty sure it does, and answers, “Have you considered painting in green?”

“Green?” Leo thinks, wondering if this ancient oak might be onto something. Or maybe it’s just a tree. Either way, he’s convinced, and he immediately files away the advice.
Meanwhile, his friend Amelia, who's practically a pro, is off in her own world, having an intense conversation with a turtle. It’s enlightening stuff. "So you’re telling me that time…is a pond?" she murmurs, writing down the turtle’s wisdom. Leo takes notes as well, partly out of jealousy but mostly because he’s learned to trust talking animals under these circumstances.

Hours later, the session ends, and Leo feels like he’s finally tapped into some sort of cosmic inspiration. He rushes back to his studio, all charged up with the power of the universe, and starts painting a grand, sweeping landscape, heavy on the green. For days, he can barely sleep, barely eat—he’s just painting, utterly convinced he’s capturing the world’s greatest truth.
When he finally stands back, Leo realizes that his masterpiece looks suspiciously like a giant bowl of salad. Lots of green, yes. Very avant-garde. But not quite what he was hoping for. The spirit of psychedelia isn’t done with him yet, though.

A week later, he decides to give the "Magic Mushrooms in the Forest" thing a go. This time he doesn’t want to paint salad greens; he wants real inspiration. So he heads to the woods with Amelia again, who’s now armed with an extensive philosophy about turtle-time.

As soon as he takes the mushrooms, things get weird. And by weird, I mean an odd mix of amazing and slightly terrifying. He watches as a passing squirrel morphs into a tiny wise man who gives him a thumbs-up. Every branch and leaf hums with energy, vibrating in kaleidoscopic waves.
He has visions—vivid, grandiose, ridiculous visions. He sees himself, Leonardo Da Vinci-style, standing on top of a mountain with paintbrushes raised to the heavens, demanding the universe to show him the secret to art. The clouds part, and out steps…an enormous mushroom, who speaks in riddles and smells faintly of parmesan.

The Mushroom Muse is surprisingly direct. “What is art?” it booms.
“Er…beautiful pictures?” Leo guesses, taken aback by the talking fungus.

The mushroom rolls its eyes—yes, mushrooms have eyes here. “No, you fool. Art is a portal to infinity. It’s not about painting a tree. It’s about painting the spirit of a tree. Do you get it?”

Leo nods solemnly, though he’s not sure if he really does. “So… less salad, more spirit?”
The mushroom sighs but seems satisfied. “Fine. Let’s go with that. Now go, and paint like you’ve never painted before.”

When Leo returns to his studio, he’s pumped. He starts painting again, this time without any plan or fear. He uses bold colors, paints with his fingers, even hurls some paint across the room in fits of passion. When he’s finally done, he has a sprawling, psychedelic masterpiece that feels less like a bowl of salad and more like the inner workings of his mind exploded onto the canvas.

Friends come by, look at the painting, and nod in approval. “It’s… intense,” they say.
After a few weeks, the painting makes it to his gallery. Critics and collectors gather around, each interpreting the piece in their own way. They whisper about the hidden meanings, the “soul of nature” they see in it. Someone even suggests that it’s a modern-day masterpiece, whatever that means.

Leo, meanwhile, just chuckles. Because as much as he’d like to claim the painting is a cosmic revelation, the truth is: it was inspired by a talking mushroom with attitude and a bunch of bizarre visions.

But hey, if the world sees enlightenment, who is he to argue?

And as for Amelia? She’s found new inspiration as well, creating an entire series called Pond-Time, a set of surrealist paintings depicting wise turtles philosophizing about the universe. It’s…an acquired taste. But she swears by it.

So, the moral of the story? Sometimes, the secret to great art is to stop taking it so seriously. Add a bit of magic, a pinch of humor, and maybe just a dash of mushroom wisdom, and let the universe fill in the rest. After all, as Leo discovered, you never know when a snarky mushroom will lead you to the masterpiece of a lifetime.
 

Evolution of an idea by Elizabeth Hefty Khoury: from metaphorical landscape to snapshots of memory. 


​This blog stems from a shift I have experienced in my own work, moving from abstraction to a semblance of realism, from metaphor to the tangible.
 
Our art is a deeply personal expression, the visual representation of our thoughts, feelings, observations, and experiences, distilled into a medium that, we hope, speaks to others. However, like any form of self-expression, an artist's journey is not static. Over time, our style, direction, and even our choice of materials may shift, evolve, and transform. For many artists, this change is not only natural but also essential to their personal growth and development.
 
The Nature of Evolution in Art
 
We can think of individual artists´ journeys as microcosms of history of art as a whole. From the earliest cave paintings to the contemporary works we see in galleries today, art has always been in a state of flux. As artists, we continuously absorb influences, encounter new ideas, and face challenges that force us to reconsider our approach. What begins as a form of exploration and experimentation often becomes a deeper, more refined expression of our inner world.
 
Consider the path of an artist like Picasso who is known for his constant reinvention, moving from his Blue and Rose periods to Cubism, Surrealism, and beyond. Each shift in his work mirrored a shift in his own understanding of the world and himself. Likewise, the abstract expressionism of Jackson Pollock emerged not just as a break from traditional artistic forms, but as an act of personal liberation—an expression of his internal struggles, desires, and impulses.
 
Artistic evolution, therefore, is not just about changing one’s visual language; it’s about the artist growing and evolving as a human being.
 
Art as a Reflection of the Self
 
One of the most compelling reasons artists shift their style is because they themselves are changing. Human beings are not static; our views, emotions, and even our senses of self evolve over time. The artist’s life is no different. A change in personal circumstances—whether a move to a new city, a shift in a relationship, or a new encounter with an idea or philosophy—can lead to a profound change in the way an artist creates.
 
An artist who has spent years focusing on representational work might suddenly feel compelled to explore abstraction. This shift could be due to a new perspective on life, an interest in pushing the boundaries of visual language, or a reaction to broader cultural movements. It could also reflect the artist’s desire to express emotions or concepts that can’t be captured through traditional forms. As we grow and mature, so does our understanding of the world and ourselves—and art becomes the channel through which these new insights are communicated.
 
Breaking Through Creative Blocks
 
Many artists reach a point where we encounter creative blocks. These periods of stagnation are often seen as frustrating and discouraging, but they are also critical moments in the artistic journey. In fact, creative blocks can be powerful catalysts for change. When we hit a wall, it can force us to look inward, re-examine our work, and ultimately push us to explore new techniques, materials, and styles.
 
What often begins as frustration or uncertainty can result in breakthroughs that lead to entirely new directions in our art. This process of trial, error, and discovery is not only vital to the development of new work but also to our sense of self. Each change in direction is a reflection of the artist’s willingness to let go of the past, embrace the unknown, and risk failure in order to discover something new.
 
The Risk and Reward of Change
 
Changing direction can be a risky endeavor for any artist. A shift in style might alienate old fans, spark criticism, or challenge the artist’s identity. After all, our signature style becomes synonymous with our brand and reputation. But despite the risks, many artists find that the reward far outweighs the fear of failure or backlash.
 
Embracing change means pushing beyond the limits of comfort and familiarity. It’s about challenging one’s own boundaries and allowing new influences and ideas to enter the creative process. Even if the new work doesn’t resonate immediately with audiences, the very act of experimentation and self-discovery strengthens the artist’s voice.
 
Ultimately, it’s the artist’s commitment to authenticity—no matter how our work may evolve—that sustains our journey. Art is a lifelong exploration, and an artist who remains true to their personal evolution will always create work that resonates on a deeper, more genuine level.
 
Conclusion: Art as a Journey, Not a Destination
 
The evolution of an artist’s style is not just a technical or aesthetic shift—it’s a reflection of our growth as a human being. Each change in style marks a new chapter in our personal journey, one that deepens our connection to our work and to the world around us. While some may fear the loss of our "signature" style, the most powerful art is often that which comes from a place of exploration, risk, and change.
 
For an artist, evolving is not just an option; it is an imperative. It is through change that we continue to discover who we are, who we might become, and how we can engage with the world in new and meaningful ways. Ultimately, it’s not the consistency of an artist’s style that defines our legacy, but our willingness to evolve and embrace the unexpected turns in our creative path.

"Genesis and Apocalypse"
Since time immemorial, humanity has obsessed over two main narratives: Genesis, where everything begins, and Apocalypse, where it all goes downhill fast. Somewhere between these two plot points, a few other events may take place, but why get lost in the weeds of daily life when you can focus on The Beginning and The End? Sure, the grocery store run isn’t as exciting as a fiery prophecy, but you’d think that by now, we’d be better at embracing the in-between.
Yet here we are. Humans have a knack for seeing every little blip, odd sunset, or out-of-season frost as a sign of impending doom. And it’s not just ancient history, this habit runs through modern culture like caffeine through a Monday morning coffee.

Living for the Ends: Genesis and Apocalypse
Let’s break down why Genesis and Apocalypse have such a hold on our imaginations. Genesis stories give us a comforting sense of purpose—“In the beginning, there was light” has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? But the problem is, if there’s a beginning, there’s probably an ending too. And wouldn’t you know it, the concept of apocalypse shows up in just about every culture around the globe. From Viking Ragnarok to the Mayan Calendar, humanity has always been a little obsessed with the idea that everything could suddenly fall apart.
But the truth is, nature doesn’t really follow this script. We like to imagine it as a neat cycle, with seasons that roll around predictably and tides that go in and out. Yet, when you look a little closer, you realize nature’s more of a continuum—an unpredictable mix of the regular and irregular. Monsoons may show up every year, but earthquakes and tsunamis certainly don’t, and hurricanes seem to be on a schedule only they understand.

Humans vs. Nature: The Need to Find Patterns
Our ancestors had it rough. Between dodging saber-toothed tigers and trying to figure out what plants wouldn’t kill them, it’s no surprise they got really good at paying attention to patterns. If you didn’t notice that the wind always picked up before a storm, you might not survive the winter. Over time, humans got even better at spotting these patterns and, let’s face it, making up a few when they couldn’t find any.
Fast forward a few thousand years, and we’re still at it. Did you know that if you break a mirror, it’s seven years of bad luck? Or that spilling salt is a bad omen unless you throw a pinch over your shoulder? These beliefs might seem silly, but they’re all part of the same pattern-seeking behavior that kept our ancestors alive. Somewhere along the line, though, we decided that some of these patterns meant the end was near. A weird solar eclipse? Definitely the beginning of the apocalypse. A string of bad weather? For sure the work of a vengeful god.

Modern Signs of the Apocalypse: Is it the End or Just Tuesday?
Let’s bring this obsession with signs and omens into the present day. Every so often, a new “sign of the apocalypse” sweeps the internet, and before you know it, people are panic-buying canned beans and toilet paper. Take, for instance, “blood moons” those eerie red lunar events. According to some, they’re harbingers of doom. In reality, it’s just the Earth getting in the way of the Sun’s light, causing a cool visual effect, but try telling that to the internet.
Or how about El Niño and La Niña? Weather patterns that shift every few years, causing unusually warm or cool temperatures and some dramatic weather. Now, to a meteorologist, this is Mother Nature doing her thing. But leave it to some people to declare it as a sure sign of the world ending. Because why wouldn’t it be?
This brings us to hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters. Despite the advances in science that allow us to predict storms and tremors, there’s still a sense of dread each time one of these events happens. People say, “This hurricane is a sign we’re doomed!”—never mind that hurricanes have been happening for as long as we can remember. And as for earthquakes, well, they’re just a friendly reminder from the Earth that sometimes things shift. It’s nothing personal.

The Continuum vs. The Cycle
So why can’t we just chill out and accept nature as a continuum instead of a predictable cycle? If life’s a continuum, then things can happen at any time, in any order. This means that while some things happen with regularity (the sun rising every day, for instance), other things are totally random. A storm may hit in April this year and August next year. But for whatever reason, our minds struggle with this concept. We like things to be neat, predictable, and most importantly, manageable. Cycles make us feel like we’re in control.
This brings us to the problem: humans are creatures of habit, but nature isn’t. It’s a bit like having a roommate who never cleans up after themselves or sticks to a schedule. You’d think after thousands of years, we’d be used to it by now, but somehow, we’re still surprised every time a thunderstorm shows up unannounced. Maybe it’s because, deep down, we like a good mystery. The unknown keeps us on our toes, and it gives us something to talk about.
​
The Art of Not Worrying About the Apocalypse
Here’s the real kicker: after thousands of years of predictions, doomsday cults, and blood moon prophecies, the world just keeps on spinning. The sun rises every day, birds chirp (well, most days), and life goes on. If there’s anything to be learned here, it’s that life’s too short to spend worrying about signs of the apocalypse. Most of the time, what we’re seeing is just a random blip on the radar of existence.
So, the next time you see an odd pattern in the clouds or hear an earthquake rumbling somewhere far away, maybe take it as just that—a reminder that nature is doing its thing. Instead of seeing it as a sign of the end, maybe it’s a sign to appreciate the little, unpredictable things that make life interesting. After all, if everything happened on a schedule, wouldn’t life be a little boring?

The color black has long been a source of intrigue and contemplation in both the realms of science and art. It is a paradox—often described as the sum of all colors and, at the same time, the absence of all light. Its enigmatic nature transcends the limits of our understanding, stretching from the vastness of outer space, with the impenetrable gravity of black holes, to the intimate details on a canvas. Artists, philosophers, and scientists alike have wrestled with the notion of black for centuries, often arriving at the same conclusion: black represents the ultimate mystery.

Science Meets Art
In the natural world, black is unique. Scientifically speaking, black occurs when an object absorbs all visible wavelengths of light without reflecting any back to our eyes. Thus, we perceive it as the absence of color. This characteristic is particularly striking in black holes, where not even light can escape. Black holes serve as powerful metaphors in our search for meaning, representing the unfathomable aspects of the universe. Just as a black hole defies conventional understanding, so does black as a concept on the artist's canvas.

In art, the color black is both complex and deceptively simple. Artists have long used black to evoke emotions, convey depth, and, above all, introduce mystery. It is not just the color of mourning or darkness, it is the color of the unknown, the subconscious, and the limitless potential of the void. Historically, it has had many layers of meaning, shifting from one cultural context to another. Whether through the delicate brushstrokes of a Renaissance painter or the bold, striking abstractions of modern artists, black has proven to be one of the most versatile and important colors in art.

The Paradox of Black
The duality of black is one of its most compelling aspects. On one hand, it is the color of shadows and darkness, associated with fear, death, and the unknown. On the other, it can symbolize elegance, sophistication, and power. This paradox is deeply rooted in both the cultural and psychological interpretations of black, making it one of the most dynamic colors in the artist's palette.
 
In the Renaissance, black was often used to represent the underworld or the dark side of human nature, as seen in paintings of the Last Judgment or depictions of Hell. But black was also revered as a color of intellectual gravity and formality, particularly in the attire of scholars and judges. Artists from Caravaggio to Rembrandt used deep, shadowy blacks to enhance their use of chiaroscuro, a technique that plays with the contrasts between light and dark to create dramatic tension.

Moving into modern art, black became a central focus in the works of artists such as Kazimir Malevich, whose famous painting *Black Square* (1915) is often seen as a radical declaration of the void. The painting consists of nothing more than a black square on a white background, yet its simplicity evokes profound questions about existence, space, and the role of art. For Malevich, black wasn’t just a color but a gateway to new, non-objective realms of thinking.

Black as the Absence and Sum of All Colors
From a purely optical standpoint, black can be seen as the sum of all colors or the absence of them. In additive color theory, black is the absence of light, while in subtractive color theory (like paint mixing), black can be created by mixing several colors. This interplay between the physical and metaphysical properties of black makes it one of the most intriguing elements in art.

The modern perception of black as the sum of all colors dates back to Isaac Newton's experiments with prisms, where he demonstrated that white light contains all the colors of the visible spectrum. However, black exists as an anomaly. It represents the boundaries where light ceases to exist, and in this sense, black is also the sum of all experiences we cannot yet grasp.

Consider the way black functions in the physical space of the universe. In astronomy, black holes are points where matter collapses under its own gravity to a point of infinite density, creating an event horizon beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape. When we think of black in this cosmic sense, it becomes not just an absence, but an overwhelming presence of all forces, energies, and potentialities compressed into a singularity. Similarly, when black is used on a canvas, it can represent a point of focus, depth, or the unknown future, waiting to unfold.
 
The Power of Black in Art History
In Western art history, black has often been treated as an accessory, a foil to the vibrancy of other colors. However, artists throughout history have demonstrated black’s ability to stand alone as a dominant color. One of the earliest examples of black’s powerful use can be seen in the ancient Greek vases of the Black-Figure pottery style. Artists used black to depict human figures and narratives in contrast to the reddish clay, showing that black could convey form, movement, and emotion.

In the 17th century, the Dutch master Rembrandt made black a cornerstone of his works. Rembrandt used black as more than just a backdrop; he used it to sculpt light. His ability to manipulate darkness to create depth and texture brought new life to his portraits, as seen in *The Night Watch*. The heavy use of black allowed for the radiant moments of light to shine with greater intensity, giving his works an ethereal glow that could not exist without the presence of such deep shadows.

Moving into the 20th century, black took on new significance in the context of abstraction and modernism. Abstract expressionists like Franz Kline used bold strokes of black to define space and structure on the canvas. His works demonstrate that black can be dynamic, energetic, and alive in its own right, not simply a background element or symbol of negativity.

Then, in the realm of minimalism, artists like Ad Reinhardt explored black as the ultimate form of expression. His *Black Paintings* consist of subtle variations of black, forcing the viewer to confront the limitations of perception. These works suggest that black is not just a void, but a space filled with nuance, texture, and meaning.

Black in Contemporary Art
In contemporary art, black continues to captivate artists and viewers alike. The color has been reclaimed, reinterpreted, and reimagined by artists across various mediums. In fashion, black is the hallmark of high elegance, minimalism, and rebellion. In digital media, black often serves as a backdrop to modern design, symbolizing sleekness and futuristic aesthetics.

Yves Klein, for instance, is known for his International Klein Blue, but he also experimented with black as a medium. He once described black as "the most aristocratic color," a statement that aligns with its historical use in fashion and art.

In photography, black is used to create mood and contrast. Ansel Adams, the famous landscape photographer, mastered the art of black and white photography, using the deep blacks of his prints to convey the monumental power of nature. His images evoke an almost spiritual sense of awe, where the absence of color enhances the drama and beauty of the natural world.

The Mystery remains
​Black remains one of the most profound and powerful elements in the world of art. It is a color of mystery, depth, and infinite possibility. Whether representing the unknown, as seen in black holes and the edges of our understanding, or acting as a fundamental tool for artists to explore light, form, and emotion, black is central to the human experience.

Its paradoxical nature—being both the absence and presence of all colors—continues to challenge our perception of reality. In art, as in science, black pushes us to confront the limitations of our understanding and to embrace the mysteries that lie beyond. It forces us to see not just what is there, but what is hidden, to feel the depth of the void, and to acknowledge the beauty that can emerge from darkness.

Art, in its essence, is a reflection of life, an exploration of human existence and the myriad interactions that shape it. Artists are co-creators of the world, transforming mundane experiences and objects into new dimensions of meaning. Belgian artist Marcel Broodthaers offers a profound example of how the artist can co-create not only beauty or meaning but also utility through their work. By using everyday objects in unexpected ways, Broodthaers demonstrated that the artist can transcend mere observation, taking an active role in shaping reality itself.
​
In the art world, particularly in the mid-20th century, artists like Broodthaers explored new ways of engaging with the world around them. He brought attention to objects that were overlooked or deemed unworthy of artistic consideration. Rather than depicting life as it is, Broodthaers’ approach emphasized the artist's power to shape and reframe life’s most common elements, inviting us to reconsider their function, purpose, and role in our lives.

Art and Usefulness: A Shift in Perspective
To understand how Broodthaers became a co-creationist of usefulness, one must first acknowledge his relationship with the Dadaist tradition. He was not merely interested in aesthetics; he was interested in how art can challenge social structures and reframe our understanding of usefulness. Through his work, Broodthaers asked fundamental questions: What is the purpose of art? Can art be useful? If so, useful to whom?

In his view, the artist’s role extended beyond beauty or commentary. He saw the artist as a re-imaginer of reality, someone who could upend traditional definitions of use. This is most evident in his use of everyday objects. His work took the tools of everyday life—the mundane, the utilitarian—and repositioned them as objects of contemplation. These objects were no longer defined by their use, but instead, by their symbolic power.

Broodthaers’ pieces challenged the boundaries between art and life. By integrating materials such as eggshells, mussel shells, and pots into his works, he reframed the relationship between the object and the observer, and even between the object and itself. In his world, the object did not serve us; it had its own existence, independent of human need or use.

The Object in Control: Subverting Expectations
One of the most famous examples of Broodthaers' conceptual approach is his use of mussel shells in installations. In these works, Broodthaers disrupts our conventional understanding of function. For example, instead of mussels being cooked in a pot, Broodthaers subverts this relationship, making it seem as though the pot is being controlled by the mussels. This reversal of roles plays into the larger theme of objects asserting their own autonomy, as if they no longer exist for human use but for their own purposes. This artistic reversal provokes thought about how we as humans interact with objects and what agency those objects might possess when detached from our preconceived notions of use.

This idea—that objects, when removed from their functional context, can take on lives of their own—is central to Broodthaers' vision. His work suggests a world in which tools and objects do not serve a singular human need, but instead, have their own existence, their own reality. In this sense, the artist becomes a co-creationist, not of new objects, but of new meanings and relationships between those objects and the world around them.

The classic understanding of usefulness is linear: tools serve a purpose, they are designed to fulfill human desires. But Broodthaers disrupts this by asking, what if the tool didn’t serve us? What if, instead, the tool used us? This shift is both surreal and deeply philosophical, suggesting that human control over the world is not as absolute as we might think.

Co-Creation Through the Lens of Language
Marcel Broodthaers was also fascinated by the relationship between language, objects, and meaning. He explored how objects could signify something beyond their functional role, becoming symbols of communication and co-creation. In his series of works using written words, Broodthaers emphasized that language itself is a tool, but one that can be reconfigured. Like objects, language has its own usefulness, but that usefulness can be subverted. Words can mean something other than what they seem to signify, much as everyday objects can take on new meanings in an artistic context.

His 1968 installation Musée d’Art Moderne, Département des Aigles (Museum of Modern Art, Department of Eagles) is a case in point. The installation was a fictional museum that critiqued the art world itself. By creating this imaginary institution, Broodthaers toyed with the idea of usefulness, questioning what museums are for and what role art should play in society. By blending objects, language, and institutional critique, he co-created a new reality where the audience was forced to confront the arbitrary distinctions between high art and everyday life.

The Artist’s Role in Co-Creation
Broodthaers’ work demonstrates that the artist is not merely a passive observer of the world but an active co-creator of its meaning and function. Through his use of everyday objects, he expanded the role of art beyond traditional boundaries, showing how objects can be reimagined and recontextualized to challenge our assumptions about utility, purpose, and control.
​
In this way, Broodthaers' work aligns with a broader philosophical idea: that life itself is a collaborative process of creation. The artist is a co-creator, not just of visual forms but of ways of thinking, ways of being, and ways of engaging with the world. By transforming the role of objects and tools, he invites us to reconsider our place in the world—not as masters of our surroundings, but as participants in a dynamic, ever-changing relationship with the objects and forces around us.

In conclusion, Marcel Broodthaers’ work pushes us to see beyond the surface, to understand that usefulness is not a static concept. As co-creators of life, artists like Broodthaers show us that meaning and function are fluid, and that the boundaries between art, object, and life are meant to be continually questioned and reshaped.

In the history of art, painters have often sought to reveal the innermost facets of human existence. From the Renaissance masters who depicted saints and biblical scenes to modern artists who explore the subconscious, the portrayal of humanity’s essence has always been a central theme. Elizabeth Hefty Khoury continues this tradition in a contemporary context, but her approach stands apart in its quiet, contemplative power. Through her paintings of unidentifiable figures, Hefty captures the intangible spirit of the human soul, asking profound questions about identity, existence, and completeness.

Hefty Khoury's work can be viewed as a visual inquiry into what it means to be human. In many ways, her paintings follow the path of sacred art traditions, where saints were depicted as floating, transcendent figures unbound by the material world. However, her figures are not saints. They are not tied to any religious dogma or theological symbolism. Instead, they are reflections of the human soul itself—shapeless, ambiguous, yet filled with a yearning for self-definition and understanding.

Floating Souls: The Search for Identity in a World of Singularities

At first glance, Hefty Khoury’s paintings can appear abstract. The human figures are barely discernible, their features soft, blurred, and floating within the dark canvases. The colors—deep, muted shades of greens, blues, and sometimes reds—serve as atmospheric backdrops, suggesting a liminal space where the figures exist between materiality and spirit.

In many of her works, as seen in her series of diptychs, the bodies are incomplete. We are given glimpses of torsos, shoulders, and chests, but rarely a full, grounded human form. It’s as if these souls are in a state of becoming, floating between realms, striving to emerge but never fully materializing. In this space, Hefty Khoury presents the soul as an unfinished entity, continually seeking to define itself in a world where individuality is both a blessing and a curse.

The tradition of sacred art is evident here, not in religious iconography, but in the feeling of transcendence. Just as medieval and Renaissance artists portrayed holy figures as larger-than-life beings floating above the mundane, Hefty Khoury depicts souls that seem to hover above the material world. But where the saints were divine, her figures are utterly human—vulnerable, incomplete, and searching. Their lack of physical identity asks us to look beyond the surface and to consider the soul as the true seat of our humanity.

The Body and the Soul: A Question of Completeness

One of the central themes in Hefty Khoury’s work is the question of completeness. In her paintings, the figures are rarely whole, and even when a full torso is presented, the lack of defined features makes them seem unfinished. This lack of completion invites us to consider what it means to be fully human. Can a soul be complete without a body? Can a body be complete without a soul? When do we, as individuals, achieve wholeness?

The philosophical underpinnings of Hefty Khoury's art can be traced back to her readings of Kahlil Gibran's The Prophet. Gibran writes about the human experience in terms of universality, describing humanity as “shapeless drops of water.” Similarly, her souls are unidentifiable, lacking distinct features that would mark them as individuals. Instead, they represent the universal aspect of existence—the core of being that we all share, regardless of external identity.

Her work suggests that the human soul is in a constant state of flux, caught between the desire for self-expression and the reality of our shared existence. The figures on her canvas may lack clear form, but they are filled with energy and movement, as if they are struggling to emerge from the shadows of anonymity and into the light of self-knowledge. This tension between the desire to stand out and the reality of being part of a greater whole is a powerful reflection of the human condition.

The Ghostly Aesthetic: Transcendence in Form and Color

Hefty Khoury's paintings are marked by their subdued, almost ghostly aesthetic. The muted color palettes and soft, flowing brushstrokes create an atmosphere of ambiguity and transcendence. The figures are often bathed in deep greens and blues, giving them an ethereal quality, as if they are emerging from the depths of the unconscious mind.

The use of light and shadow in Hefty Khoury's work further enhances this feeling of liminality. The figures are never fully illuminated, but neither are they completely obscured. This play of light and dark suggests the duality of the human experience—the constant struggle between the known and the unknown, the material and the spiritual, the self and the other.

In many of her works, Hefty Khoury uses contrasting colors to further this sense of duality. The cool blues and greens that dominate one side of the canvas are often countered by warm reds and pinks on the other. These colors do not clash; rather, they seem to exist in harmony, representing the balance that every human soul seeks between conflicting forces—light and dark, body and soul, individuality and universality.

A Silent Meditation on Existence

What makes Elizabeth Hefty Khoury’s art so compelling is its quietness. These are not paintings that scream for attention; rather, they invite the viewer into a space of silent meditation. Standing in front of one of her works, we are asked to slow down, to reflect on our own place in the world, and to consider the nature of our own souls.

There is something deeply contemplative in the way Hefty Khoury presents her figures. Their lack of distinct features makes them both anonymous and universal, inviting us to see ourselves in their formlessness. At the same time, their incompleteness challenges us to confront our own feelings of incompleteness. In a world that often values material success and external achievement, Hefty Khoury’s paintings remind us that the soul’s journey is one of internal growth and understanding.

Elizabeth Hefty Khoury’s Legacy: Art as a Mirror of the Soul

In a world that often feels fractured and chaotic, Elizabeth Hefty Khoury’s art provides a space for quiet reflection. Her works speak to the timeless quest for identity and meaning, asking us to look beyond the surface and to consider the deeper, more universal aspects of our existence. Her paintings capture the soul not as a static entity, but as a living, breathing force—one that is constantly evolving and seeking completeness. In this way, Hefty Khoury’s art serves as both a mirror and a guide, reflecting our own struggles and aspirations while offering a vision of transcendence. Through her works, we are reminded that while we may be incomplete, the journey toward wholeness is itself a beautiful and meaningful part of the human experience.

In Elizabeth Hefty Khoury’s world of unidentifiable souls, we are all searching. Searching for identity, for meaning, for completeness. And while the answers may remain elusive, her art offers us a space to pause, reflect, and continue the journey toward understanding.